Decision
Ilusorio v. Court Of Agrarian Relations
G.R. No. L-20344 · 1966-05-16 · CONCEPCION, J. · LawPhil
POTENCIANO ILUSORIO and TERESA ILUSORIO, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, PASCUAL MANALILI, SANTIAGO PANGILINAN, IRENEO DE LA CRUZ, GONZALO SANTIAGO, GRACIANO MANGALINDAN, JOSE MALLARI, RICARDO BALMEO, SALVADOR SANTIAGO, VALENTIN PACHECO LEANDRO MANINGAS, EMILIANO PACHECO, TIMOTEO…
CONCEPCION, J.:
Appeal from a decision of the Court of Agrarian Relations; the dispositive part of the which reads: IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING, the Court hereby holds that Section 14 of Republic Act No. 1199, as amended, is constitutional and the leasehold system of tenancy shall govern the relationship of the parties, except Nicodemus Magcalas and Miguel Santiago, starting with the 1961-1962 agri-year. Petitioners are hereby ordered to pay per agri-year to respondent-landholders rentals in the amount appearing opposite their names: NAMES RENT IN CAVANS OF PALAY 1. Miguel Sta.
Ana 17.66 cavans 2. Domingo Santiago 15.88 " 3.
Timoteo Magcalas 17.46 " 4. Leandro Maningas 13.77 "
5. Valentin Pacheco 9.37 " 6.
Gonzalo Santiago 5.59 " 7. Salvador Santiago 13.24 "
8. Emiliano Pacheco 9.21 " 9.
Santiago Pangilinan 25.86 " 10. Jose Sta.
Ana 21.99 " 11. Graciano Mangalindan 17.05 "
12. Ricardo Balmero 17.25 " 13.
Ireneo dela Cruz 16.05 " 14. Jose Mallari 11.06 "
15. Artemio Gabriel 10.29 " Respondent-landholders are hereby ordered to return to petitioners the following amounts of palay of the variety harvested appearing opposite their names: 1.
Miguel Sta. Ana 22.28 cavans 2. Domingo Santiago 12.73 "
3. Timoteo Magcalas 11.6 " 4.
Leandro Maningas 10.14 " 5. Valentin Pacheco 15.26 "
6. Gonzalo Santiago 6.01 " 7.
Salvador Santiago 11.93 " 8. Emiliano Pacheco 11.92 "
9. Santiago Pangilinan 16.62 " 10.
Jose Sta. Ana 10.65 " 11.
Graciano Mangalindan 17.21 " 12. Ricardo Balmeo 17.58 "
13. Ireneo de la Cruz 17.7 " 14.
Jose Mallari 12.85 " 15. Artemio Gabriel 13.38 "
TOTAL