Decision

First Division]. [17](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt17) Id. [18](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt18) Ponencia, p. 3. [19](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt19) Rollo, p. 61. [20](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/j

First Division]. [17](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt17) Id. [18](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt18) Ponencia, p. 3. [19](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt19) Rollo, p. 61.…

First Division]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt17) Id. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt18) Ponencia, p.

3. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt19) Rollo, p. 61.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt20) Ponencia, pp. 2-3. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt21) Id. at 1.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt22) Id. at 2. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt23) Id.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt24) Id. at 2. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt25) Republic v. Court of Appeals and Molina 335 Phil. 664, 678 (1997) [Per Justice Panganiban, En Banc]: "The essential marital obligations must be those embraced by Articles 68 up to 71 of the Family Code as regards the husband and wife as well as Articles 220, 221 and 225 of the same Code in regard to parents and their children."

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt26) Ponencia , p. 9. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt27) FAMILY CODE, art.

36 provides: A marriage contracted by any party who, at the time of the celebration, was psychologically incapacitated to comply with the essential marital obligations of marriage, shall likewise be void even if such incapacity becomes manifest only after its solemnization. The action for declaration of nullity of the marriage under this Article shall prescribe in ten years after its celebration. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt28) 642 Phil. 602 (2010) [Per J. Nachura, Second Division].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt29) Id. at 627. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt30) Marcos v. Marcos, 397 Phil. 840, 850-852 (2000) [Per J. Panganiban, Third Division].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt31) Id. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt32) Ponencia, p. 9.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt33) Rollo, p. 60. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt34) Id.

at 13, Petition for Review. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt35) Id. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt36) Santos v. Court of Appeals, 310 Phil. 21, 30 (1995) [Per J. Vitug, En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt37) Id. at 36, citing Salita v. Hon. Magtolis, 303 Phil. 106, 113-114 (1994) [Per J. Bellosillo, First Division]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt38) Id.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt39) Aurelio v Aurelio, 665 Phil. 693, 703 (2011) [Per J. Peralta, Second Division]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt40) Id. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt41) Santos v. Court of Appeals, 310 Phil. 21, 39 (1995) [Per J. Vitug, En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt42) 310 Phil. 21 (1995) [Per J. Vitug, En Banc]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt43) Ponencia, p. 6.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt44) 579 Phil. 187 (2008) [Per J. Carpio Morales, Second Division]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt45) Ponencia, p. 6.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt46) 335 Phil. 664 (1997) [Per J. Panganiban, En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt47) Id. at 676-679. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt48) 598 Phil. 666 (2009) [Per J. Nachura, Third Division].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt49) Id. at 696. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt50) Id.

695-696. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt51) Id. at 698-699.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt52) Id. at 699. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt53) Id.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt54) Kalaw v. Fernandez, G.R. No. 166357, January 14, 2015 <http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/2015/january20151166357.pdf> [Per J. Bersamin, Special First Division]. This Court granted petitioner's motion for reconsideration and similarly declaring the parties' marriage as void due to psychological incapacity. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt55) Id.

at 6-7. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt56) Rollo, p. 60.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt57) Id. at 61. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt58) Id.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt59) G.R. No. 203284, November 14, 2016 <http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/2016/november2016/203284. pdf> [Per J. Del Castillo, Second Division]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt60) Id.

at 7-8. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#rnt61) Ponencia, p. 11.

The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation [![](https://lawphil.net/images/back.gif)](javascript:history.back\(1\)) [![](https://lawphil.net/images/top.gif)](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/feb2017/gr214064so2017.html#top) ![](https://lawphil.net/imgs/bckgnds/010.gif)