Decision

Villarama v. Casifio

G.R. No. 207257, G.R. No. 206510 · 2014-09-15 · LawPhil

<http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=jurisprudence/2014/september2014/206510 leonen.pdf> [Per J. Villarama, Jr., En Banc]. [10](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt10l) Id. at 10-11.…

En Banc]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt3l) Id. at 343.

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt4l) RULES OF COURT, Rule 3, sec. 2 provides: Section 2. Parties in interest.

- A real party in interest is the party who stands to be benefited or injured by the judgment in the suit, or the party entitled to the avails of the suit. Unless otherwise authorized by law or these Rules, every action must be prosecuted or defended in the name of the real party in interest. (2a) (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt5l) RULES OF COURT, Rule 3, sec.

3 provides: (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt6l) Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of J. Leonen in Paje v. Casino, G.R. Nos. 207257, 207276, 207282 & 207366, February 3, 2015 <http://sc.judiciary.gov. ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/2015/february2015/207257 Jeon en.pdt> 6 [Per J. Del Castillo, En Banc]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt7l) Oposa v. Factoran, Jr., 296 Phil. 694 (1993) [Per J. Davide, Jr., En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt8l) Id. at 711. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt9l) Concurring Opinion of J. Leonen in Arigo v. Swift, G.R. No. 206510, September 15, 2014 <http://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=jurisprudence/2014/september2014/206510 leonen.pdf> [Per J. Villarama, Jr., En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt10l) Id. at 10-11. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt11l) ld.

at 2. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt12l) Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of J. Leonen in Paje v. Casifio, G.R. Nos. 207257, 207276, 207282 & 207366, February 3, 2015 <http://sc.judiciary.gov .ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/20 l 5/february20 l5/207257 leonen.pdf> 4 [Per J. Del Castillo, En Banc]. (https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt13l) Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of J. Leonen in Paje v. Casino, G.R. Nos. 207257, 207276, 207282 & 207366, February 3, 2015 <http:/ /sc.judiciarv.gov.ph/pdf/web/viewer.html'?fi le=/jurisprudence/20 l 5/february20 l 5/207257leonen.pdf> 5-6 [Per J. Del Castillo, En Banc].

(https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#rnt14l) Concurring Opinion of J. Leonen in Arigo v. Swift, G.R. No. 206510, September 15, 2014 <http://sc.judiciary.gov. ph/pdf/web/viewer.html?file=/jurisprudence/2014/september2014/206510 leonen.pdf> 13 [Per J. Villarama, Jr., En Banc]. The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation [![](https://lawphil.net/images/back.gif)](javascript:history.back\(1\)) [![](https://lawphil.net/images/top.gif)](https://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2017/mar2017/gr211010so2017.html#top) ![](https://lawphil.net/imgs/bckgnds/010.gif)