Decision
(Formerly A.M. No. 06-5-175-MTC) OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, vs. Ms. ROSEBUEN B. VILLETA, Clerk of Court II, Municipal Trial Court, Oton, Iloilo, Respondent.
A.M. No. P-06-2211 · 2010-11-23 · LawPhil
(Formerly A.M. No. 06-5-175-MTC) OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, vs. Ms. ROSEBUEN B. VILLETA, Clerk of Court II, Municipal Trial Court, Oton, Iloilo, Respondent.
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC A.M. No. P-06-2211 November 23, 2010 (Formerly A.M. No. 06-5-175-MTC) OFFICE OF THE COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, vs. Ms. ROSEBUEN B. VILLETA, Clerk of Court II, Municipal Trial Court, Oton, Iloilo, Respondent. PER CURIAM: We resolve the present administrative matter that traces its roots to the financial audit conducted on the books of account of the Municipal Trial Court (MTC) of Oton, Iloilo, for the period November 1, 1993 to August 31, 2005. Ms. Rosebuen B. Villeta, Clerk of Court II of the court, is the accountable officer.
The Antecedents The relevant facts are set out in the Memorandum/Report of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) dated July 28, 2008,1 and are summarized below. The OCA conducted the audit in 2006, due to the non-submission of financial reports to the OCA Financial Management Office. The audit team made the following findings:2 1.
An over-remittance of ₱1,050.50 in the General Fund (GF) due to Villeta's practice of not regularly depositing her collections. 2. A shortage of ₱805.60 in the collections for the Special Allowance for the Judiciary Fund (SAJF) for the period November 11, 2003 to August 31, 2005.
3. A shortage of ₱1,672.80 in the collections for the Judiciary Development Fund (JDF) for November 11, 2003 to August 31, 2005. 4.
A shortage of ₱229,300.00 in the collections for the Fiduciary Fund (FF) coming from rental deposits and cash bonds; withdrawals of cash bonds must be supported by a court order and an acknowledgment receipt from the accused; withdrawals are disallowed without these supporting documents. The amount of ₱125,000.00 was temporarily credited in favor of Villeta pending her submission of copies of the court orders and acknowledgment receipts; otherwise, the amount shall be added to her accountability that would then amount to ₱354,400.00. 5.
Tampering of official receipts involving several criminal cases where the accused's cash bonds were mispresented as collections either in the JDF or GF account instead of the FF account; worse, the amounts in the original copies of receipts were understated in the triplicate copies of the receipts. The audit team reported that when it confronted Villeta with its findings, she admitted using the undeposited/unremitted collections for her personal gain.3 In a Resolution dated July 26, 2006,4 the Court directed Villeta to restitute, within 15 days, her shortages in the SAJF (₱805.60), JDF (₱1,672.80), and FF (₱229,300.00) collections, for a total of ₱231,778.40; to furnish the Fiscal Management Division, Court Management Office with machine-validated deposit slips; and to submit the supporting documents for disallowed withdrawals and to explain why she should not be administratively sanctioned for her shortages and for tampering with the official receipts of cash bond deposits.
The Court re-docketed the report as a regular administrative matter and suspended Villeta during the pendency of the case. The OCA referred the matter to Presiding Judge Ernesto H. Mediodia, MTC, Oton, Iloilo, particularly the reported tampering of official receipts for the FF "to determine the extent of the responsibility of the respondent in the anomaly."5 Judge Mediodia, in his report dated August 22, 2006,6 confirmed the OCA audit team's initial findings on the tampering of the official receipts of the accused's cash bonds in the criminal cases cited in the report. The judge recommended that Villeta be charged with dishonesty and gross misconduct, without prejudice to the filing of appropriate criminal charges against her.
The OCA's Evaluation of Villeta's Explanation In her letter dated April 10, 2007,7 Villeta explained that her shortage for the SAJF is only ₱18.80 and not ₱805.60 as reported by the audit team. She presented the following computation: Beginning balance (end of July 2005) ₱ 57.20 August 2005 collections 2,115.40 September 2005 collections 1,408.00