PLAI

← 2026 · Labor Law & Social Legislation

PayNow Solutions, Inc., a FinTech company based in Taguig City providing digital payment and lending platforms to small and medium enterprises…

2026 Bar Exam · Labor Law & Social Legislation · Question 6 · Essay

The question

PayNow Solutions, Inc., a FinTech company based in Taguig City providing digital payment and lending platforms to small and medium enterprises, employed Arjohn, a resident of San Jacinto, Pangasinan, as a front-end developer on a work- from-home basis. Arjohn was paid PHP 5,000.00 per completed module, regardless of the number of hours spent. Due to the sensitivity and confidentiality of the software modules, Arjohn was required to access PayNow’s computer system and to log-in and log-out from North Star Human Resource platform for authentication, data security, and submission purposes, without monitoring or regulation of his working hours. Is Arjohn entitled to holiday pay and service incentive leave pay? Explain.

Parts of this answer could not be checked against its sources. Read the law and the decisions in their tabs before relying on it.

Held

No, Arjohn is not entitled to holiday pay and service incentive leave pay, under Rule IV, Section 1 and Rule V, Section 1 of the Issuances of the Department of Labor and Employment and its Attached Agencies.

Explanation

The Supreme Court in Auto Bus Transport Systems v. Bautista clarified that employees engaged on task or contract basis or paid on purely commission basis are not automatically excluded from entitlement to service incentive leave. Instead, exclusion applies only if they also fall under the classification of field personnel, meaning their actual hours of work cannot be determined with reasonable certainty and their performance is unsupervised. Thus, being paid per module or per task does not by itself exclude an employee from holiday pay or service incentive leave; it must also be established that the employee is a field personnel as defined by law.

Application to the facts

Arjohn is paid PHP 5,000.00 per completed module regardless of hours spent, and he works from home. He is required to log in and log out from the North Star Human Resource platform for authentication, data security, and submission purposes, but there is no evidence in the facts provided that PayNow Solutions, Inc. uses this system to monitor or regulate his actual working hours or performance beyond these technical requirements. The Supreme Court in Auto Bus Transport Systems v. Bautista requires an inquiry into whether the employer can determine the employee's actual hours of work with reasonable certainty. The facts do not establish whether the log-in/log-out requirement enables the employer to determine Arjohn's actual hours of work with reasonable certainty, or whether his time and performance are constantly supervised. Therefore, it cannot be conclusively determined from the given facts whether Arjohn is excluded from holiday pay and service incentive leave as a field personnel. What remains unestablished is whether the employer's system allows for reasonable certainty in determining Arjohn's actual hours of work.

  • unverified (contradiction): The conclusion categorically excludes Arjohn from holiday pay and service incentive leave pay, but the application section admits that the facts do not establish whether Arjohn is a field personnel, which is a necessary condition for exclusion.
  • unverified (wrong_rule): The answer applies the exclusion for task/contract basis or commission basis employees as if it is automatic, but Auto Bus Transport Systems v.
  • unverified (incomplete): The answer fails to resolve the entitlement issue as required by the question, given that the necessary fact (whether Arjohn is field personnel) is not established.
This is general legal information, not legal advice.